Submit your question below about any cosmetic procedure to be considered for posting with an answer from one of our board-certified plastic surgeons.
Note: ASAPS cannot give advice about specific medical problems nor should answers provided by responding surgeons be substituted for a complete medical history, work-up and an in-personal medical/surgical consultation. Sorry we can't answer all questions. We try to select questions that have the widest general interest.
I am interested in having my breasts enlarged. Which is better—implants under the...
I am interested in having my breasts enlarged. Which is better—implants under the pectoral muscle or over it? It seems to me that if they are over the muscle, the implants could sag over time due to their weight and the elastic property of skin. Also, is it possible to have a facelift and breast lift done at the same time?
There are a variety of factors that influence the decision of whether implants should be placed above or behind the pectoral muscle. In women who are relatively thin with minimal breast tissue above the nipple, saline implants are better concealed behind the muscle and the appearance may be more natural. On the other hand, women who have some drooping of the breast gland and thicker fat above the nipple often will get a better lifting effect from placing the implant on top of the muscle. The larger and heavier the implant is, the more gradual stretching of the skin and breast you will have over time. You will want to discuss these and other factors – such as how implant placement may affect mammography -- with an ASAPS-member plastic surgeon. In healthy patients, breast and facial surgery can be safely done at the same time.
This may be a somewhat controversial statement, but in my opinion there currently is really only one acceptable position for breast implants in an elective cosmetic surgery patient: behind the pectoralis major muscle (sub-pectoral augmentation). There are a number of very compelling reasons to place implants behind the pec major, and the most compelling one of all is the fact that radiologists report that the mammographic imaging of breasts for the purpose of breast cancer screening tends to be more easily accomplished when breast implants are sub-pectoral (compared to pre-pectoral, also referred to as the 'sub-mammary' position). An American woman's current lifetime risk of breast cancer is approximately 1 in 8 to 1 in 9, so the issue of breast cancer screening must be taken very seriously. Mammography is by no means a perfect screening study, but it is the standard of care at this point in time. The most sensitive and specific test for breast cancer is a contrast-enhanced MRI scan, and breast implants do not impair breast tissue visualization by MRI.
The next very compelling reason to select sub-pectoral placement is a cosmetic one. Implants placed on top of the pec major tend to stand out in the upper pole of the breast, creating a rounded, convex and distinctly unnatural-appearing breast profile. With implants in a sub-pectoral position, the upper pole of the implant is flattened somewhat by the muscle, helping to create a smooth transition from the area in the upper chest where the breast begins, and a gradual slope towards the nipple that is not excessively rounded or convex. In some patients with a fuller breast volume preoperatively one may get an acceptable appearance with pre-pectoral placement - initially. The problem is that as breasts age, the fatty tissue atrophies and breast tissue thins out, and the area where this is most obvious is in the upper pole and cleavage area. So a pre-pectoral implant that was initially well-concealed may, after a few years, become painfully obvious (including visible implant folds and ripples) in the upper pole.
'Under the muscle' and 'sub-pectoral' are actually somewhat misleading terms, as in most cases the implant is only partially subpectoral. The anatomy of the pectoralis major muscle is such that it is actually just the upper/medial half of the implant that is covered by the muscle, while the lower/lateral half of the implant is submammary. The pectoralis major thus provides an additional layer of tissue to conceal the implant in the most cosmetically significant area of the breast: the cleavage area. This is why saline implants are often easy to feel laterally, as they are covered by breast tissue only in lateral aspect of the breast, and in slender patients who have small breasts preoperatively the implant is often immediately under the skin in this area.
Some facial rejuvenation procedures could be performed with a breast augmentation surgery but most plastic surgeons would not perform a full facelift and breast augmentation together
When one is considering breast augmentation with breast implants, you have several options
1: size. However the ideal size depends on the desired size, the size of the chest, the base width and height of the breast.
2: Type of implant, silicone or saline. This is a patient preferance and level of comfort. You need to understand the pros and cons of each type.
3: Placement of incision, inframammary, periareolar, axillary (periumbilical to be complete)
4: Placement of implant. Sub-pectoral, or sub-mammary. This decision depends on the amount of breast tissue available to give good coverage of the implant and the type of implant. Given the right patient with good coverage of breast tissue, either position can give you a good result.
If you do not have enough breast tissue coverage then it should be placed in the subpectoral position for good coverage of implant.
sub-pectoral: have better coverage of implant. Less interference with mammogram( although with digital mammogram both can have good mammogram)., May be less capsular contracture, Slightly more pain and longer recovery, Less waviness,
Sub-mammary with enough coverage can have very good results. Digital mammograms, and MRI can visualize the breast tissue very well. less pain and recovery, IN MY OPINION natural look.
Risks and complications are the same.
The most important choice is choosing the right plastic surgeon who can discuss these issues in details with you and performs a good examination and evaluation to help you choose and make an intelligent decision.
There are significant advantages to having breast implants placed beneath the chest muscle. Your concerns about sagging are one but in addition breast implants beneath the chest muscle are less likely to develop capsular contracture or hardening. However in patients who have sagging breasts or ptosis a breast lift is often necessary in order to place the breast implants under the chest muscle. Some patients with adequate breast tissue and sagging breasts can in some cases have their implants placed beneath the breast avoiding the additional surgery of the breast lift. Please consult board certified plastic surgeon for an examination and opinion.